WEREWOLF {WP} wrote: ....
So, this all falls to the responsibilities of the squads. After all, we( the experienced players ) are trying to only make rules to make the game fair, particularly to the fresh cuts. So, again, its only up the largest squads to enforce etiquette.
The question is: What is acceptable and who decides?
The point of squads seems more to be a collection of people who share common philosophy on how to play the game. The perspective can be fairly common sense or it can be fairly fringe. Once a squad decides to police the game it can become a vigilante mob who can drive off new players who have not found "the rules" posted anywhere.
There have been many times where a member of a squad has reported on a newer player who was offending them in some way only to have the rest of the squad go hunting them. The noob has often asked for an explanation of what the rules are and where to find them only to be ridiculed and vilified.
On one hand, established players often accuse droppers of "stat padding" (which may or may not be true) while on the other hand it is just as valid of a point to say that established players are trying to protect their stats by insisting that players without as much experience/skill meet them head on. The argument that droppers ruin games is only true if you can't figure out how to counter the dropper. With team chat now available there really is no excuse for the lack of ability to work strategically with your team.
Anyone trying to police others into adopting their playing style through shaming is bullying, especially if they call on their squad to go after a newer player. Other established players who's play style you don't like are fair game in-game but there are actual rules against flaming anyone in-game or on the forum , while no rules exist against droppers, sneakers or campers.