[M*]JÄCK BÜRTÖN1 wrote:
Longrifle wrote: That's not the AI. Can't post fom here, but will look for pics tomorrow. The AI fielded in 1917, but was replaced in most French escadrilles by the SPAD
Sorry this is the al thats better.
Yep, that's the one. She's pretty enough, right? Actually fielded over the front, nearly identical wingspan and profile to the D.VIII, therefore similar target area, though I'm interested since seeing Wig's comments on coding if the frontal area is the problem or if the frontal area is mistakenly coded such to have a an advantage.
I "see" the frontal area visible and realize that it has a pixel pattern associated with it, so a bullet probably doesn't go in between wthe wings of a biplane, but registers a hit. With a monowing this area would be less than half; dropping the pixel targeting area for one wing and the intervening space.
Too bad we can't turn on "visible target area" and see what the bullet sees, like infrared. That would answer a lot of questions. Even if the AI above was fielded as historical against the more performance than historical D.VIII I bet it would be more even than Camel vs. D.VIII, unless the bullet range is made more realistic and bullet drop is introduced. WWI planes firing flat trajectory lasers at ranges up to 1.5 kilometers introduces gameplay that is far less than realistic, and gives advantage to the smallest target on the battlefield. The actual killing advantages should be speed, turn radius, manueverability, aircraft frame strength, firepower, etc.
In reality the D. VIII never saw much combat, and the BMW-powered D.VII was the superior fighter at the end of the war. I can't find more than a couple references to D. VIII's scoring kills, and they were not extensively fielded in any front line Jasta at armistice that I can reference.