I initiated this whole thing. I started this account as Lafayettenousici, then changed my name to Goshawk, then to JEB Stuart when I started up the CAC. I thought of this squadron as a reflection in the game for something some of us identify with in our non-game lives. When you recruit for a squadron like this, you reach out to people who might have a southern or confederate connection, either related to their in game name, a posting on a forum, or their point of origin as they indicated on their profile.
I think I sent out that feeler PM (that bzerkbzerk started this thread with) to five players. 5 players. What percentage of players is that in the game? I'm not sure, but it's probably less than a tenth of one percent. Now someone decided that PM stood for public message instead of private message.
Oy vey.
In my mind there is no concept of spying in this game. We don't have squadron wars, squadron members are frequently too far apart to directly aid another squadron member when both are blue, or fly against each other. There are soooo many posts on this forum, as well as freely IM'd freely given advice given in-game by senior players, that I find it difficult to conceive of secret strategies that can only be concocted in private. When we get to a squadron wars situation, then we may have to worry about this. Many players jump squadrons or start their own. Are we to assume this is for the nefarious purpose of stealing squadron "work product?"
This is just a game to me, despite the fact that I waste a tremendous amount of free time doing it--believe me, I could be doing a lot of other more important things in my day. But I love this game. My first airplane toys were World War One biplanes. I concentrated my BA in history on the First World War.
Some people here take the game and loyalty to a squadron much more seriously than I had imagined. In retrospect, I should have thought about that. When GreyGhost replied to my PM, he asked me not to recruit from the Misfits; I promplty replied that I would not. I don't believe I sensed then that he had any concern about "spying".
I solicited the participation of people that had exhibited a southern connection--e.g. GreyGhost is a reference to John Singleton Mosby, or other players that had posted pro constitution, pro liberty, or pro second amendment statements in other forum threads. These people are more likely to have some connection to, or understand the motivation of the Confederate States.
I was educated in a public school in New York state; my father is a North Carolinian. In grade school, I heard all of the usual pro Union, evil confederate stuff and my feelings toward the Confederacy were basically disgust and incredulity, like some who have already responded on this thread.
When I was a kid in school, one question about the Confederacy always perplexed me. Who would fight for slavery? Why would a non-slave owning private (90 plus percent of the Confederate States Army) risk his life and the security of his family and wealth to preserve slavery?
It turns out most of the rank and file was not motivated to fight to preserve that institution. The working southern man in 1860 was no more fond of the rich slave owners than the modern blue collar workers are for the 1% crony capitalists and banksters of Wall Street.
Turns out the rank and file fought for many reasons, with preserving slavery being as low on the Confederate side as there were abolitionists in the north (abolitionists estimated at 3% of the population at the time of the War). Most common reasons: 75000 volunteers from the North invaded the South, directly threatening their homes and families, preserving the original concept of the Union -- that it was voluntary, that a State was a sovereign country that voluntarily joined with the other states, and created a Federal (i.e. same root as Confederate) government to delegate certain very specific responsibilities. The war started over the right of secession--can a Sovereign state that voluntarily joins a Union then later voluntarily void the compact. It was a war with strong economic, philosophical, and cultural underpinnings. Slavery was a proximate constitutional cause of the war -- the southern states took issue with the federal government overstepping their mandate and the 87 year old status quo over the issue of slavery.
I found out only two years ago (I am a doctor, 47 year old father of three) that I am descended directly from 5 veterans of the CSA, and several Revolutionary War veterans. None of my Confederate veteran ancestors was a slave owner, and none owned more than a one family farm. This led to more and more reading about the Confederate side of things and thus to my current identification to the Confederacy. Public school books are court historian Kool-Aid. I know, I've drunk that Kool Aid before I read more on the subject.
With regard to the second account solicitation: I meant no offense to anyone. In my mind, a second account to a legit player is just for fun. You know, fun. Like a game. Isn't that why we are here? This isn't Coke vs. Pepsi for me...If you fly with Enigma with one account, you shoot down CAC players. If you then fly with the CAC in a second account against Enigma, you play for a different team, you shoot down enigmas...big deal. Fun. No one dies. You get points. You go up in rank. You compete against yourself as much as others.
The only person who makes money out of this is Zup, and the more power to him for making a worldwide product that is used across multiple platforms by people of myriad backgrounds. The essence of
true capitalism, and I wish Joaquin/Zuperman a lot of success (just get the Samsung 3S squared away, for G-d's sake). A second account may be discouraged, but economically it is shooting himself in the foot, just when he is ramping up. Don't expect the guideline, rule, or whatever you want to call it to be enforced, ever.
Please feel free to respond.

JEB Stuart, previously Goshawk