×

Warning

Empty password not allowed.
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Should we add big WW1 bombers

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #354877

  • FlyBoys
  • FlyBoys's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
  • Thank you received: 1
Like it will be hard but I will defenatly support and help as much as I can... For instance I have some ideas for each WW1 team

Germany: Goths G5, AEG4

Britain: Bristol F2, Airco DH4, Airco DH9

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #354881

  • Dognamitt
  • Dognamitt's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • you will miss 100% of the shots you dont take
  • Posts: 2935
  • Thank you received: 5159
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cricket

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #354882

  • FlyBoys
  • FlyBoys's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
  • Thank you received: 1
I'm just hoping we all work together and make the players experience worth while

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #354981

  • Airborne Kiwi
  • Airborne Kiwi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Who said Kiwi's couldn't fly?
  • Posts: 382
  • Thank you received: 518

FlyBoys wrote: I'm just hoping we all work together and make the players experience worth while

I do too, I have multiple posts about this. Bombers were meant to be added a while back, but Zup hasnt got to it yet

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355067

  • zuperman
  • zuperman's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 3775
  • Thank you received: 10755
What do you mean? You haven't played a bomber mission yet? They were added a few months ago

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355083

  • Airborne Kiwi
  • Airborne Kiwi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Who said Kiwi's couldn't fly?
  • Posts: 382
  • Thank you received: 518

zuperman wrote: What do you mean? You haven't played a bomber mission yet? They were added a few months ago

I think he means to actually be able to fly the bombers, defend yourself, deliver the groceries and return home. It all sounds quite fun.
The following user(s) said Thank You: FlyBoys

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355332

  • FlyBoys
  • FlyBoys's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
  • Thank you received: 1
No like add real bombers for example a WW2 Bomber can be a B25 and a the WW1 bombers can be a AEG 4 thats is what I'm talking about.. We need to add real bombers not one seat fighter/bombers plus I think it would be nice if we left people use them freely.

Here's a Goths G5 I think we can add I do have the prints so we a'll can do it.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Last edit: by FlyBoys.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355338

  • Airborne Kiwi
  • Airborne Kiwi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Who said Kiwi's couldn't fly?
  • Posts: 382
  • Thank you received: 518
I would love to see the Ju 88 and maybe the Wellington

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355391

  • S. E. Dailey
  • S. E. Dailey's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • fortis Fortūna adiuvat
  • Posts: 543
  • Thank you received: 867

While the idea of flying a P61, B-25, or B-17 in game sound intriguing . . . I think it's a bit of overkill for 8 light weight hangars.

If you're going to add real bombers, they need more to bomb, more range to travel to the target, and some automated AA batteries to deal with. I think that's beyond the current scope of the game.
.
...
The following user(s) said Thank You: [M]LtDan nhouse

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355403

  • Airborne Kiwi
  • Airborne Kiwi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Who said Kiwi's couldn't fly?
  • Posts: 382
  • Thank you received: 518

S. E. Dailey wrote: While the idea of flying a P61, B-25, or B-17 in game sound intriguing . . . I think it's a bit of overkill for 8 light weight hangars. The P61 was more of a ground attack aircraft and we already have the IL-2. I dont think its too much of a stretch for the P61 but I agree with your point.

If you're going to add real bombers, they need more to bomb, more range to travel to the target, and some automated AA batteries to deal with. I think that's beyond the current scope of the game.
.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 7 months ago #355558

  • FlyBoys
  • FlyBoys's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
  • Thank you received: 1
I do have some ideas we can put in the game

And yes I do have some ideas to the WW1 and WW2 bombers

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Last edit: by FlyBoys.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 6 months ago #356025

  • Flyboy[B]
  • Flyboy[B]'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 8
  • Thank you received: 3
I feel it would be cool to have bombers and in a t I would probably be glued to this game even more.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 6 months ago #356192

  • FlyBoys
  • FlyBoys's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 6
  • Thank you received: 1
Dont worry guys I'll figure something out in the bombers.


Though those that are not subscribers will have a chance to get there hands on the bombers too that way its fair.

The one thing we all need to worry is that as long as anyone can play them its a fair play game. I'm sure you will agree with that.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 4 months ago #360107

  • [BE]sergeand65
  • [BE]sergeand65's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 9
  • Thank you received: 0
How to change between front and both side turrets in the bomber ? Anybody know ?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 4 months ago #360185

  • [NLR]Mysterio
  • [NLR]Mysterio's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Boarder
  • Gold Boarder
  • the less you reveal, the more people can wonder
  • Posts: 313
  • Thank you received: 611

[BE]sergeand65 wrote: How to change between front and both side turrets in the bomber ? Anybody know ?


The first to get in bomber gets front place, 2nd right en 3de left side, so you can't really choose, if you want the back you have to w8 that someone get before you in the bomber

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Should we add big WW1 bombers 2 years 2 months ago #362618

  • New York Jet$ fan
  • New York Jet$ fan's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • Expert Boarder
  • As you can tell, I am a fan of the New York Jets.
  • Posts: 90
  • Thank you received: 39
I sort of agree with what S. E. Dailey said. I think larger aircraft like the B-17 (one could argue the B-25 as well in some ways) would just be too much based on what the game currently is and has been since the beginning. However I think the addition of planes such as the Gotha G.V, AEG .IV, Friedrichshafen G III, and Handley Page Type O would be a great thing to do. Nothing too seriously advanced for this game and it'd be fairly balanced and on par with most, if not all, of the First World War fighters in the game.
J-E-T-S JETS!!!! JETS!!!! JETS!!!!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Last edit: by New York Jet$ fan.
  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.403 seconds