What do you all think of having a secure text communications channel during the game?

You'd proceed a message with "Reds" or "Blues" to talk to your team or to the enemy and,like now, have no tag to talk trash and joke to everyone?

E.g., "Blue Seattle stay with our carrier,everyone else go to neutral carrier"
or "Blues Hoagie check for high fliers heading to our base" or "Blues Let the tanks far from base go" or "Reds Prepare to die"

You get the idea. I think it could take the team work and tactics up a huge leap and make the games much more fun. And maybe shorten some of the marathon games where everyone is doing thier own thing.

Imagine the possibilities....

I love that idea! I most of the time have a game plan that would.......let's say annihilate the enemy. But I can't say it or the reds would know what it was!! We need a private chat for blue and red teams.

I like, even that may sound strange coming from someone who can't chat.

Adding a button might be to much. I play on a website where if you put the "%" before your post it would be teamchat what about somethin like that.

Or we could do something like this; just typing in the message [no symbol] would be only for your team. But putting a symbol [or something like it] would let everyone see the message.
In dogfight this option wouldn't exist.

Nah Hamers, it'd be best if we used chat commands like most games.

All you would have to do is type "/t *whatever message you want here*" and it would display on your team chat.

No, this doesn't exist yet. But I'm sure it will in the near future.

Thanks Slenderman!

Sure thing, Green!

:woohooSo iam in sounds great

Slenderman wrote: Sure thing, Green!

what?

He likes the idea of a secure communications channel. And also, I don't think he knew I was green freedom!

See ya around, green freedom

why does brian have negative karma?

Player BP and him were having a little dispute.

This is a good idea that has been suggested on more than one occasion. With the advent of squadrons/clans it makes even more sense. Could be difficult to implement I guess....

Yes it would...........