Thanks to all who have posted and especially to those who sent PM s.
My hope is to get people to think about others more and to relax a bit and to really let the game be a game!
It's almost a "religious" divide how different people seem to feel about the issue. To me it comes down to players freedom to enjoy the game without having additional restrictive rules. (I guess I'm a dogfight libertarian?
) If a rule can't be "coded into the game " it makes controversy and unnecessary squabbling.
I understand that there are those who would like the game to have a variation where there is a mission which is only head to head bombing runs. Unfortunately this only seems possible with unenforceable rules. Any rules that try to enforce this would create a greater need for blacklisting, moderating, reporting....who really thinks that would make the game better?
Any of you who like the head on only battles; would it be a problem if there was "team chat" and you were able to coordinate escorts and bombers? Or do you just want everyone to go head on into the valley of death?
There is no historical precidence for the head-to-head-only battles. There is very little strategy in it. It makes very little use of the games potential. Do you really feel that it is reasonable to ask that all bombing games be limited to this? The case has been made by others that there are only two bombing missions and those should be left to the people who like head on fights. Really? Shouldn't there be a mission with bombs which is more in line with how the real battles were fought?
If new maps were an option maybe there could be a "canyon" variation with a powerful jet stream above the canyon walls so everyone would need to stay on course and head to head. Or maybe a variation where you could only drop on a target. (Yuck
)
Unless a new variation comes the head-on players are asking for restrictions which are voluntary or manually enforced. It really is not feasible. Think about it. How do you communicate this to every player? Not everyone is on the forum and even if they were there is no consensus. The only way this can be enforced is by shaming, berating, threats, vindication...what kind of "community" does that promote?
STFU!
(Okay, "STFU" is rude. I'll tone it down, but don't have any patience for those who call me a cheater when I feel fully justified for the way I play. If you want to give me "what for" in game go ahead. Just don't make me try to swallow any BS.)