Dunc7 wrote: This is excerpt from "The President's Corner", which I hope you will all visit! I call on my fellow wolves to consider this issue carefully, because you are the finest squadron around with, from what I can see, the highest standards of behavior.
"The world of Dogfight is like the Old West in the US. Everyone's toting guns and usually aren't afraid to use them! In fact, the best are gunslingers and they rule the roost. MORAFs fall into this category. Personally, I think being a MORAF carries with it the responsibility to enforce the rules as well as to set the highest example, like unto being a member of King Arthur's knights of the Round Table. Chivalry and strict adherence to a code of ethics are required. However, I will admit that there are some MORAFS who obviously don't agree with me, and they can be counted among the worst offenders. Their example is copied by the noobs very quickly, and it takes a concerted effort on everyone's part to change their behavior. The bad ones usually go away if enough people despise them.
Just recently, an Aspirant named Escaramango ruined several games I was in by team-killing, bombing his own hangars, flying without bombs to other base to camp and spawn-kill. Didn't listen to reason or threats of reprisal. Only thing that got through was when I had finally had enough and killed him. A couple others did the same, and he eventually left, only to show up in another game and repeat the same cycle of behavior all over again. This morning, who shows up in a good game but good old Escaramango! I immediately warned everybody what he was, but they didn't believe me, even after he bombed his own hangar. SwopCaml, in particular, insisted that it was just a mistake. Of course, it wasn't, and Escaramango proved me right once again.
The point here is that we do need a better way to effectively police this behavior with more than words. What do YOU say on this particular subject? Do you think empowering certain members of our MORAF Club would be a good thing? I do, after Escaramango and all the others like him I've seen before."
Why shouldn't members of our squadron be in this select group? Please talk about it, and drop by The President's Corner to let me know what you think as well as who you would select to be part of this Special Ops task force? Thanks, everybody, and Owwwwooooooohhhhhh!
I agree with what you have posted here, however I will say there will be folks who are going to say this has been tried in the past. Before my time, but there was a group.... T.A.S.K. I believe, who did the "policing" of the game in a manner similar to what you have described (at least from what I have gathered)
Without sparking a huge debate my input is as follows; Play how you like. The really "bad" apples are usually identified and taken care of via the blacklist thread or other "word of mouth" type information. Dunc, you and I, and all of Wolf Pack for that matter, have standards which we have agreed to by belonging to this squad. We cannot force anyone outside our squad to play in an honorable manner just to appease ourselves. I have stated before, and it still holds true, if you are in a game with someone who you don't like to play with, leave. Its that simple. (of course a subscription comes in handy for that course of action)
Again, I agree with you and your described manner of honorable play is pretty much the Wolf Pack way, but it may not be everyone's way, nor should it be. We need antagonists to keep it interesting. We need sneakers, droppers, and even spawnkillers, to get us fired up and even bring us all together. And think about this.... how cool was it when we, as a squadron, decided we were going on a "hunt" for a player who wronged one of us? Good stuff right there, and necessary in my opinion.
Anyhow, that's my .02. I do admire your zeal for the presidency. Your honesty and sense of what is decent and right makes me glad you are a wolf, my friend. I agree with Talon... you rock!