You know what, Gizmo is right. Many of us like to play the game fair and try not to get the upper hand on all that are in the game. It's very clear that when a lower rank in a starter plane is thrown into the mix of top players in top planes that they stand no chance at all when these top players are flying bombless.
McFate, you kiddie pool comment doesn't phase me but is over the top because it's doesn't fit in to what you are trying to say. I have no issue with playing an all out game as you say if it were a fair match and not one where we throw in players to be sitting ducks for easy kills. I for one try to respect my fellow lower rank players by not having to get the upper hand on them by using all available tactics to do so. See it's not a kiddie pool as you like to refer to it because there's a mix of the best and the beginners. So it's more of a let's all take a dip in the piss pot pool. Some of us prefer not dropping a turd in that pool where others do.
Here is where you are right. I too would like to see an all out option in the game. There should be some requirements though. For example you need to be at least a level 23 player and at least have a tier 5 plane. This creates a real challenge and more of a balanced field.
For me to take on the style of play that you say we whine about in games the way things are set up now is not how I am nor many others here. It's not that we can't handle it, it's because we do not feel the need to beat up on those who would stand no chance against us. Maybe it's just how I feel but I do believe some share this same feeling.
Also you often speak of your "Meta" ways of playing and using tactics. Yes your right to an extent that they work. Lol...funny you call it "Meta" and make it seems like you are the only one that knows how to use certain tactics to get the win. Maybe I will call my tactics "Funzzz with Gunzzz" because dang I know they are quite effective. Lol...I think most of us top guys know what to do and will be very effective using these skills in a playing field that you are referring to.
Botton line is this. The way the game is set up now most of the games are decided by who has the better players on that side and very seldom come down to who is using tactics. How many games have I been in where I am pretty much the one keeping my team alive and even the thought of sneaking for me is not an option. Sure I can send a noob to go try but if I am lucky that noob may be successful 1 out of 10 runs. Then there is the red team, stacked with good players yet find it necessary to sneak against me. Sure I may hold them off here and there but eventually I will be unable to keep it up especially when these reds are also dropping, glitching or anything along these lines.
Well I take that as a compliment that they actually had to resort to this style to get the win so no lose for me no matter what the score board says at the end. Meanwhile they are all celebrating like they have accomplished something so great in successfully burning a hanger along the way. Lmao...I really do find that amazing. That's not being tactical, that's being desperate to win the game in any way possible.
That is not who I am or how I play the game. It's not that I can't, it's because it's too easy.
Make the playing field even and I am in for your everything goes play. I would actually look foward to it. As Dailey said though I can guarantee it will not go smoothly. Maybe less accusations but it will just be another place to argue over the same issues we do now.
I do get what you are trying to say and do like the idea. Trying to get it to that point is another story and having the game actually run smoothly without any issues, well we can all dream.
.
.