The idea is simple.
When you have a real abusive player.
You have a button, that is a vote to ban that player .
So you ask the other players to kick the abusive player.
If you all or 80% agree, he's kicked.

FOX#1 [BB] wrote: The idea is simple.
When you have a real abusive player.
You have a button, that is a vote to ban that player .
So you ask the other players to kick the abusive player.
If you all or 80% agree, he's kicked.

I like it but I can see people getting irritated in a lopsided game and kicking that one defender that keeps screwing them up from bombing. I can promos you it will happen. I will be in a lopsided game were its me vs 7 other people and it will go on for a long time with me keeping them from bombing.

After a while they start complaining your a lagger and a hacker using a lag switch. They start calling you out for all this bull shit just to make them selves feel better about them getting there ass handed to them over and over because they are selfish little jack wagons.

Knowing the way a large majority of the players of this game are you are going to witness anyone who trys to use tactics other than just carrying a bomb and going center all the freaking time getting kicked out of the game because it was against the rules that these players made up.

Got to hate it when a squadron group trys to enforce there squad rules on you when you did not join their freaking squadron. You ask them were that rule comes from and they say well in our squad rules and then they list off a bunch of bull crap. There are so many idiots out there like this that people are going to get kicked out of games for stupid things like dropping there bomb to dogfight, or sneaking around, they will get kicked for making good use of there agility after they bomb an enemy hanger by hanging around and collecting there reward for bombing. There is a reason Z added a repair to pilots bomb a hanger. You get in you bomb then you keep the enemy busy in a dogfight over there base to allow your team mates a better chance of getting in and dropping there bombs. The game was called dogfight for a reason but it must be a crime to fly the game the way it was intended and that was to gain air superiority and hold it. That means you get in bomb hold the enemy down while the other 3 players on your team get in and finish off the hangers. Not leave and let the game last another trillion hours.

I just don’t think the majority of the dogfight community is very trusty worthy and that a large percent of them will just make and excuse to kick you from a game if you are completely destroying them. Now notice hear I am not saying any names so no need to get all defensive unless you want us to suspect your one of that group that makes up bull crap to make your failure less your fault. I am just putting out my observation and how this system will be abused like no other if it was implemented.

Whew at first I though you meant sucky players like me. Heck I have a hard time hitting the ground much less a red!!

Yea I agree with skydavis. One one person says ur lagging, EVERYONE aggres with him/her, then ur in trouble, even though ur doing nothing wrong.

BTJ582 wrote: Whew at first I though you meant sucky players like me. Heck I have a hard time hitting the ground much less a red!!

lol that is what I was thinking at first when I first read it. I was thinking what the heck so if If I get a person who is doing no good on my team I can kick him and hope for a better player lol. Then I read the first post and it clicked.

This is a bad idea. No ones can say some pilot it's a bad player. Many have rules, styles and ways to play different to other pilots.

If only the dirty-mouths were going to be kicked, I would say yes; but we all know people would abuse it - and, worse, bad players would have the same button, huh?
A good idea, but not feasible.

i agree with sky, yesterday i was in pro server against much better planes that i could not yet take down, so i ascended and dive bombed the hanger, got 6 hangers this way at least and my blue's were loving it but the reds were all complaining, but we won, and i got 6 hangers instead of being a bullet sponge the whole time, but my point is i could see ppl getting voted out for something the other team might not like or know how to defend but there is nothing wrong with.

I.would be nice to kick the bad ones. But I think something like that would be abused.

Hi

A few days ago i was in a game against Sky and may be he is making some references about this. The reds were outnumbered but they succeeded a very good attack on our base. Sky was first to bomb and come back just one time to cover a bomber. Then flew to his base. One of (my) blue then never stopped to harass him "cheater" "against the squad rules" etc ... just boring ...

It is sad to see that this can happen even when pilots outnumbered are doing beautiful things in a game !

We remember the time before Zup made in game penalities for team killers. When someone was beginning to trash talking, blue and red were all against him, that was street justice but that was so fun !!

Really have a few disagreements here.
First, in a vote of everyone (minus the one the kick is for).
Red's and blue's Moraf's nubies different squads, fairness variations ect .
All have to agree one getting rid of one guy.

OK one person sneaking on a base would be seen as bad by reds, but not blues.
One person is left on red team, and everyone would have to agree to kick him.
Including good blues and bad, noobs and Morafs.

And to really get a kicking accomplished, you have to discuss it.
That would bring up issues with certain players.

And what's the one thing everyone in this game can agree on?
Bad eggs ruin the fun. Aka sk,ers potty mouths ect.

Btw. This idea is directed at such people.
You might have abuse but really minimal

Even after a discus of that, it's not good. No on a can say some one it's a bad player, no one. And if some one it's brooking a rule you mut report hem to black list , that's all